The
Great Recession has led to the Great Reset.
It was so disrupting that industries, markets, and leading economic
indicators have been thrown off kilter.
Even though we are into the sixth year of the recovery, many industries
remain dysfunctional is some way.
This clock was very accurate before the Great Recession |
Below is an example of what is happening in the Class 8 truck market. It is having its best year since 2006, yet
the traditional methods of tracking and forecasting the market are still
unreliable. The forces of demand and
supply are of course active, but the environment is very different than before.
Strange Happenings In The Class 8 Truck Market
Something strange is happening in the Class 8 truck
market. We just had record quarterly orders in Q4, making 2014 the
second-highest order year ever. This order deluge has pumped up backlog to the
highest point since 2006.
So you would expect production in 2015 to get off to a
rip-roaring start, with factories going full-out to churn out loads of trucks
to satisfy this torrid demand. However, this did not happen. January production
was much below expectation, 18% lower than last November, on a per day basis. Factories
were easily able to satisfy order requirements without working much, if any,
overtime.
What is going on here? It’s not enough to just look at
the order and backlog numbers by themselves, it is also important to analyze
the delivery dates on the orders and the quarterly distribution of the total
backlog.
I had previously posted about the unusually large number
of orders placed in 2014Q4 for second-half 2015 delivery. However, what was not
obvious at the time was that not enough of those orders were being placed for
2015Q1 delivery to put significant pressure on OEM build rates in the
short-term. In other words: many orders for delivery in seven months, fewer
orders for delivery in three months.
Yes, order patterns had changed in two important ways,
both related to the Great Recession. First, some of the Q4 orders can be
considered “catch-up” orders. They should have been placed up to a year earlier
but were not, due to residual caution and risk aversion from the Great
Recession. It is the pent-up demand from fleets needing new equipment, for both
replacement and expansion, but not placing orders because of leftover economic
anxiety. By using a new data analysis method, FTR was able to determine that
the backlog of six months ago was inadequate to support the expected sales. Therefore,
orders needed to increase to support the market environment. We got them, but a
few months later than normal.
The second factor is that the Great Recession caused OEMs
to reduce industry capacity. Several plants were closed, resulting in capacity
falling from 375,000 units/year to 350,000 (new calculation based on November
2014 production rates). Because of very tight production capacity in Q4, fleets
were motivated to place large orders to reserve production slots in Q3 and Q4,
2015.
Truck OEMs are resistant to investing in new fixed
capacity because of the cost and the cyclical nature of the business. These
types of decisions are being made throughout the industry. One component
supplier that closed three plants during the Great Recession opened a brand-new
facility last year.
At this point, it looks like the extra-heavy Q4 was the
result of OEM sales strategies to try to gain or lock-up market share this year.
It does not appear the huge orders signaled record sales, and production
capacity should not be maxed in 2015. Of course if the economy and freight grow
faster than forecasted this year, increasing truck demand could indeed maximize
production.
Things are different on the trailer side. The orders have
been huge, but most of the major OEMs are running at full capacity and expect
to stay that way through at least Q3.
How
Is Your Industry Functioning After The Great Recession? I would like to hear
about the struggles you are facing.
Please email me at donake@outlook.com
No comments:
Post a Comment